AI Models Compared
Comparison of the Textures.com AI model compared with the just released new Substance Sampler AI. Same input images, tried to find the best result possible in sampler. Easier said than done, the results are pretty random and the template list is limited. Seems to only be working ok-ish on narrow list of materials. I've included one example where Adobe's model is in some proximity to ours (last image).
Our model does not need any tweaking to get a good result - the samples from our model are direct without any user tweaking. That being said this is still under heavy development.
Images used as Input are from Textures.com
PS. Clown face is just me being facetious.
Less of a gap here but still not the same level.
albedo example 1 (input diffuse on the left)
albedo example 2 (input diffuse on the left)
albedo example 3 (input diffuse on the left)
Example of a material created from an input with harsh lighting